Stewart/va

[HARDCORE]

Outside of alleged insider trading, lying is the basic charge that got Martha Stewart in deep trouble, or so they claim? She was cut no slack for her actions, however, and is now doing time for fibbing to the Powers That Be!

So tell me again, ?What In The Hell Is The Difference? between her alleged lies to make a few more bucks (quite a few more), and a Highly Placed VA Employee?s Wanton Falsifications Under Oath? in order to screw over a fellow veteran?

Money alone, although a poor excuse for any betrayal, at least shows some underlying motivation! Whereas, lying under oath for brownie points, or personal advancement alone (possibly even under direct orders?), is the calling card of a human snake! (opinion)

While Stewart is doing (semi) hard time, however, the provable perjury of that VA employee is (as far as I know), getting him nothing more drastic than free-flowing suds, a pat upon the back, a well-done, and maybe even a future promotion to bigger and better things?

As a matter of fact, even a White House Official, a former VA Honcho, a top VA attorney, and an RO bigwig, had proof solid of this blatant perjury! Unfortunately, however, all (except for the White House, who expressed genuine concern in my opinion), attempted to cover-up this travesty!? (Simply Amazing!!)

Each and every time that I offered (and gave in many cases) proof of this falsification and willful misconduct (as covered in Bailey v West), the VA jungle went silent!

So tell me again (please), what is the difference between lies under oath in the private sector, and those undertaken by government employees?

VERITAS