Holy(?) Men or Killer(?) Mullahs

[reconeil]

Holy(?) Men or Killer(?) Mullahs
by N.R. Filidei
(commentary on patriotfiles.com - 4/7/04)


First and foremost and since deadly serious, let's talk differently realistic and from a historical perspective, and not politically. Thusly, and in that context it must be realized that only politicians or fools could possibly believe that America's Constitution also gives every foreigner on earth (even foreigners in hostile territory during wartime) The Right of Protest and demonstrating against American Policies (peacefully or otherwise).

That's just not so. The American Constitution only guarantees and protects The Rights of American Citizens and their Right of Protest only on American Soil PERIOD,...and most certainly gives no right to protest for a hostile enemy in foreign lands.

Unfortunately for: "America's Finest" (re. U.S. Military) plus Coalition Forces fighting in Iraq, "Political Science EXPERTS(?)" calling-the-shots in Iraq don't realize such, and thus the reason for civilian leaders foolishly ordering The Military to with quite difficulty (additionally more dangerous also) fight politically-correct warfare against a quite vicious and murderous foe. Truly sad. But, sadly true.

It doesn't seem to matter to: "Political Science EXPERTS(?)" in total command of The Military (and Press/Media also), that all fanatical assasins led by and rallied-on-by: "Killer(?) Mullahs" of The Middle East are actually no different now than hundreds of years ago (probably thousands of years ago?). Nor, that what was taught: "From the cradle to the grave" way-back-when to Islamic Fanatics, is still similarly taught to this very day.

Basically stating what Islamic Fanatics are religiously taught from birth is that: "The only Good (Infidel) is a Dead (Infidel)". Get the picture?

Then too, isn't placing warfare restrictions on ourselves when fighting against a fanatically-murderous enemy and/or whose only restrictions while murdering defenseless men, women and children are that there are no restrictions,...a bit foolish?

"A bit foolish",...HELL! Being politically-correct during warfare is downright asinine, self-defeating and nationally-suicidal. Truly sorry for all those in uniform politically directed/ordered to contend with such a one-sided absurdity.

Besides, what sane reasons could there be for being the first in history to conduct politically-correct warfare, while simultaneously: "Nation Building" and even permitting The Right of Protest and demonstrating by merciless and insane Islamic Killers? None that I can see, nor why ANY NATION ON EARTH would order their forces to accept such unwarranted risks to life and limb,...for over a year?

Granted, all out and one-sided politically-correct warfare has never been attempted before by anyone. So, it's sort-of understandable why MANY civilian leaders (Administrations, all Senators and all Congressmen) have failed miserably at such. After all, politicians are only expert at whatever it is (?) that politicians do,...whereas generals, officers and sergeants are the only ones having any expertise whatsoever on this warfare business. It's truly that simple,...even though no lordly politician would dare admit such.

Still, and all the quite stupid political dictates of The Military aside, answer me this. Why were Shiite "Holy(?) Men" permitted to build up a hostile 10,000 man militia,...for over a year? Are you Civilian Warlords just plain nuts, since apparently not even wanting to offend scum? GET REAL fools.

What's next after subduing those Islamic nuts, at no doubt great cost to American Life & Limb? Will YOU bring the about 8,000 (plus THEIR FAMILIES) survivors back to America under the guise of: "Political asylum",...as was quite asininely done by YOU for captured Iraqis in 1991 or 2(?), by unarguably our quite astute civilian military leaders?

I sure hope not. Believe that the previous Iraqi Terrorist Cells brought back here at great Taxpayer Expense was already enough cruel and unusual punishment to The American Taxpayer and America in general. And besides,...don't believe that The Iraqi Terrorist Cells already here need any further assistance. DO YOU?

The End



Neil

[Keith_Hixson]

When we leave Iraq now or later. That country will be one big blood bath after we leave. The many forces desiring to control Iraq are many. All have radicals with weapons. Radical Muslim factions are a bunch of nuts. We might as well pull out today. No amount of stabilization will work.

Keith

[reconeil]

Believe you're right about that more than likely: "Blood Bath" bit, after we leave Iraq. Plus, you could probably say the same thing about Bosnia, when all: "The Peacekeepers" leave. Understand they've got just about as many factions hating each others guts there also.

Besides Keith, shouldn't America be good sports about such? After all, both in Bosnia and Iraq various factions of fanatical nuts have been killing each other just for sport,...for at least 700 or 800 years.

Thusly, let people have their strange blood sports and just butt-out. Then everyone will be happy. "They" get to kill each other at every opportunity, as is normal,...and we get to play Baseball and Football, as is normal.

If the sicko Islamic (or whatever type) fanatics of Bosnia and Iraq ever get tired of killing each other,..."They" both need only call The UN 911 number for any speedy and emergency needs. Yeah, sure? They'll all be dead before the UN ever resolves ANYTHING. Hey,...there's always a first time?

Neil

[Seascamp]

At a time I made the assumption that the term ?Mullah? meant Clergy and was more or less like what we know as western Clergymen or Clergywomen. As it turned out that was a 180-degree out assumption as nothing could be further from the truth. In real and practical application they are leaders; thus the term Mullah, and depending upon setting and situation are in fact civic/political leaders whose span of control covers everything from soup to nuts and may or may not include spiritual ministrations as we know them to be, but usually not. They can be the belaying pins of a Theocracy and be in the role of Arsonist, Fireman, Policeman, Judge, Jury, and Hangman and a study of what really, really went on during the Islamic Revolution in Iran is a study in reality as to who the Mullahs really are and what they really have in mind. What happened in Iran is gory as all hell and significant in that it was Shiite Moslems murdering and butchering Shiite Moslems in thousands, tens of thousands actually, and all via Mullah?s drumhead kangaroo courts and summary execution.

The open/not so open fratricidal and fanatical 1200 plus -year-old war between the Shiite and Sunni Moslems over the rights of succession as the supposedly ?anointed? representatives of the alleged Prophet Mohammed has fired up one more time and this time around the USA is in the eye of the blood storm/whirlwind. Iraq is the historic battlefield of Sunni vs. Shiite wars and what we see now is just one more iteration of the same old crap, just a different day.
Under Saddam, the Sunni minority brutally suppressed the Shiite majority and now that the Shiite Mullahs are able too, they are grabbing for the ultimate power and there is nothing ?Holly? about them or what they are up to. They want a Theocracy and they want to be Dictators of all things, pure and simple. And it?s not any guesswork as to what they will do to grab the reigns of power and the ultimate power of life and death over millions upon millions. In the paradox and final analysis of it all, Al Qaeda is the mortal enemy of the Shiite Mullahs as they are after the same ultimate power in the Islamic world or world at large; depending on what we choose to give up, but are on opposite sides of the traditional and forever Sunni-Shiite wars.
So it would seem we have met the mid-east Hydra head-on and I suppose we?ll do a Vietnam style cut n? run deal one more time and just stand by and watch the fire ball roll on and on and consume all it?s path.
I'm not optimistic nor have I ever been optimistic that we have the unity or resolve to stay with an Iraq situation for long as our track record stinks when it comes to even agreeing on a threat let alone doing anything about it.

Scamp

[BLUEHAWK]

What Keith and Scamp said...

And, I said the same thing two years ago.

[Boats]

Ya know its gotta be something they are eating? The degree of hatred toward the Westerner's is unreal. Are they really worth saving - do they need saving?

What is their problem? They are acting like a country that is still 2000 years old. They are stone age people with little to show for all their existence.

Capturing people and torturing them to make a leave is the lowest kind of human being I know. Iraq is heading toward total annihilation. If it wasn't for the oil these people would have absolutely nothing to show for all the years they've been on this earth.

Nation building really sucks - ask the English!

[reconeil]

Can't argue with anything you've stated, and especially regarding that: "Nation building". After all, "Nation building" during wartime (politically-correct warfare type or normal) while hostilities are still at a feverish pitch, doesn't just: "Sucks". It's downright stupid.

Such displays a cavalier disregard for American Lives (both civilian and military), while simultaneously placing more value on foreign lives and physical needs by America's Civilian Political Warlords,...while oddly perpetrating a sort-of criminal negligence towards the welfare and well being of ones very own. Don't believe any American ever signed on-the-dotted-line to become a uniformed and thus highly visible walking or riding target of opportunity for fanatical assasins? Do you,...OR ANYONE believe such?

Scamp,
Thanks for informing us as to what Mullahs most often do and actually are,...and that any phoney and purposeful tie-ins such have to God or Allah are purely show-biz, for duping their followers and insuring obedience and/or for assasin recruiting purposes only. No ifs, ands or buts.

Neil