Battle of Gettysburg

The Battle of Gettysburg


Federal Confederate

Engaged
85-88,000 70-75,000

Killed
3,155 3,903

Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
14,529 18,735

Missing
5,365 5,425

Total Losses
23,049 28,063

On 30 Sep 2003 13:57:56 -0700, Dean Shultis
wrote this crap:

> The Battle of Gettysburg
>
>
> Federal Confederate
>
>Engaged
> 85-88,000 70-75,000

My sources show 95,000 and 75,000


>Killed
> 3,155 3,903
>
>Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
> 14,529 18,735
>
>Missing
> 5,365 5,425
>
>Total Losses
> 23,049 28,063


Good research, but not equal to the 50,000 killed in Vietnam.



Hero@Horvath.net

Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

And from this you got 50,000 KIA?

ted

"Dean Shultis" wrote in message
news:blcqok01cej@drn.newsguy.com...
> The Battle of Gettysburg
>
>
> Federal
Confederate
>
> Engaged
> 85-88,000 70-75,000
>
> Killed
> 3,155 3,903
>
> Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
> 14,529 18,735
>
> Missing
> 5,365 5,425
>
> Total Losses
> 23,049 28,063
>
>
>
>

In article , Ted Gittinger says...
>
>And from this you got 50,000 KIA?
>
>ted

No. I had read that there were 50,000 KIA. Maybe it was at the Smithonian...
I don't remember... I found this info after 30 seconds of research. Didn't you
teach history? Maybe you could jog over to the LBJ Library tonight in your
tights and look it up...

>"Dean Shultis" wrote in message
>news:blcqok01cej@drn.newsguy.com...
>> The Battle of Gettysburg
>>
>>
>> Federal
>Confederate
>>
>> Engaged
>> 85-88,000 70-75,000
>>
>> Killed
>> 3,155 3,903
>>
>> Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
>> 14,529 18,735
>>
>> Missing
>> 5,365 5,425
>>
>> Total Losses
>> 23,049 28,063
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 2309 GMT, "Ted Gittinger"
wrote:

>And from this you got 50,000 KIA?
>
>ted
>
>"Dean Shultis" wrote in message
>news:blcqok01cej@drn.newsguy.com...
>> The Battle of Gettysburg
>>
>>
>> Federal
>Confederate
>>
>> Engaged
>> 85-88,000 70-75,000
>>
>> Killed
>> 3,155 3,903
>>
>> Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
>> 14,529 18,735
>>
>> Missing
>> 5,365 5,425
>>
>> Total Losses
>> 23,049 28,063
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
I'm not sure that there is a point to my post other than war is
horrible. I grew up in Maryland where we learned Antietam was the
bloodiest battle of the war. The battle took place over September
17-18, 1862. I think the first day was not nearly as bad as the
second. The tally, Union dead 12,400, Confederates 10,000 dead. The
Union stood their ground, so they called it a victory.
http://cpcug.org/user/jlacombe/tom.html

http://www.englisch.schule.de/state_...ect/getty4.htm

--
If you get what you want, what's to stop you
from asking for more?

"Dean Shultis" wrote in message
news:blcqok01cej@drn.newsguy.com...
> The Battle of Gettysburg
>
>
> Federal
Confederate
>
> Engaged
> 85-88,000 70-75,000
>
> Killed
> 3,155 3,903
>
> Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
> 14,529 18,735
>
> Missing
> 5,365 5,425
>
> Total Losses
> 23,049 28,063
>
>
>
>

http://www.civilwarhome.com/Battles.htm

--
If you get what you want, what's to stop you
from asking for more?

"Dean Shultis" wrote in message
news:blcqok01cej@drn.newsguy.com...
> The Battle of Gettysburg
>
>
> Federal
Confederate
>
> Engaged
> 85-88,000 70-75,000
>
> Killed
> 3,155 3,903
>
> Wounded, and Mortally Wounded
> 14,529 18,735
>
> Missing
> 5,365 5,425
>
> Total Losses
> 23,049 28,063
>
>
>
>