What medal did George W. Bush get for his Vietnam service?

"Lee" wrote in message
news:iut720lns5u7vj6r818hv5r0eaa35s3gok@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 1416 GMT, "Roger" wrote:
>
> > wrote in message news:848720918slvlv6u7ma9gspfp6h88hl19s@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:49:34 GMT, Fair and Balanced Hyco-Limbaugh Fart
> >> Detector, having his head up his own a$$ wrote:
> >>
> >> >he merely went AWOL
> >> LOL!!!! More like you liberals lost your grasp on reality.
> >> Now run along loser.
> >
> >He's a mass murderer. What's a little skipping out on his military
> >obligations?
> >
>
> You really are out to lunch.

He had no reason to start the war. Thousands of people died. That's called
murder. Mass murder is when you kill many people.

Bush is a mass murderer.

Roger wrote:
>
> "Lee" wrote in message
> news:iut720lns5u7vj6r818hv5r0eaa35s3gok@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 1416 GMT, "Roger" wrote:
> >
> > > wrote in message news:848720918slvlv6u7ma9gspfp6h88hl19s@4ax.com...
> > >> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:49:34 GMT, Fair and Balanced Hyco-Limbaugh Fart
> > >> Detector, having his head up his own a$$ wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >he merely went AWOL
> > >> LOL!!!! More like you liberals lost your grasp on reality.
> > >> Now run along loser.
> > >
> > >He's a mass murderer. What's a little skipping out on his military
> > >obligations?
> > >
> >
> > You really are out to lunch.
>
> He had no reason to start the war. Thousands of people died. That's called
> murder. Mass murder is when you kill many people.

You mean like the Waco Massacre?

> Bush is a mass murderer.

"Richard Rongstad" wrote in message
news:40249614.4E3381B0@NOSPAMvikiingphoenix.com...
> Roger wrote:
> >
> > "Lee" wrote in message
> > news:iut720lns5u7vj6r818hv5r0eaa35s3gok@4ax.com...
> > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 1416 GMT, "Roger" wrote:
> > >
> > > > wrote in message
news:848720918slvlv6u7ma9gspfp6h88hl19s@4ax.com...
> > > >> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:49:34 GMT, Fair and Balanced Hyco-Limbaugh
Fart
> > > >> Detector, having his head up his own a$$ wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >he merely went AWOL
> > > >> LOL!!!! More like you liberals lost your grasp on reality.
> > > >> Now run along loser.
> > > >
> > > >He's a mass murderer. What's a little skipping out on his military
> > > >obligations?
> > > >
> > >
> > > You really are out to lunch.
> >
> > He had no reason to start the war. Thousands of people died. That's
called
> > murder. Mass murder is when you kill many people.
>
> You mean like the Waco Massacre?

Exactly. Too bad the killers died in the fire.

>
> > Bush is a mass murderer.

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 1416 GMT, "Roger" looking
stupid and acting same, wrote:

> wrote in message news:848720918slvlv6u7ma9gspfp6h88hl19s@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:49:34 GMT, Fair and Balanced Hyco-Limbaugh Fart
>> Detector, having his head up his own a$$ wrote:
>>
>> >he merely went AWOL
>> LOL!!!! More like you liberals lost your grasp on reality.
>> Now run along loser.
>
>He's a mass murderer. What's a little skipping out on his military
>obligations?
>
LOL!!!! And you have your head up your own a$$
Get back to us when you get a clue.

wrote in message news:027d20985bdk7mquj6keflm4dviobl2k2r@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 1416 GMT, "Roger" looking
> stupid and acting same, wrote:
>
> > wrote in message news:848720918slvlv6u7ma9gspfp6h88hl19s@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:49:34 GMT, Fair and Balanced Hyco-Limbaugh Fart
> >> Detector, having his head up his own a$$ wrote:
> >>
> >> >he merely went AWOL
> >> LOL!!!! More like you liberals lost your grasp on reality.
> >> Now run along loser.
> >
> >He's a mass murderer. What's a little skipping out on his military
> >obligations?
> >
> LOL!!!! And you have your head up your own a$$
> Get back to us when you get a clue.

He started a war for no reason. People died as a result. Many people.

All are accepted facts. When taken together, were he not a President, he'd
be a mass murderer.

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 0122 GMT, "Roger" still
playing his stupid card, wrote:
>
>He started a war for no reason. People died as a result. Many people.
He started what the previous administration failed to act on.
Funny how many dummycRATS agreed and all of a sudden they
are flip-flopping like fish outta water.
Must be that neo-soc liberal thing during an election year.
BTW, people die in wars, look it up in your history book Stupid.
>
>All are accepted facts. When taken together, were he not a President, he'd
>be a mass murderer.
LOL!!!! And that makes Bin Laden and Sadam what, Holy Saints?
Get back to us when you get a clue, Loser......

wrote in message news:6gdk209eh4bp8d0qjmh1l86ta25a2ectp4@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 0122 GMT, "Roger" still
> playing his stupid card, wrote:
> >
> >He started a war for no reason. People died as a result. Many people.
> He started what the previous administration failed to act on.

Using your "logic," he started what he failed to act on.

He didn't start the war against Iraq until 2 1/2 years after HE had been in
office.

What was his damn problem? Did Clinton really have control over what HE did?
Why didn't BUSH act?

> Funny how many dummycRATS agreed and all of a sudden they
> are flip-flopping like fish outta water.
> Must be that neo-soc liberal thing during an election year.
> BTW, people die in wars, look it up in your history book Stupid.
> >
> >All are accepted facts. When taken together, were he not a President,
he'd
> >be a mass murderer.
> LOL!!!! And that makes Bin Laden and Sadam what, Holy Saints?
> Get back to us when you get a clue, Loser......

herr_stormtruppen_al_franken@yahoo.de (Adolph Al Franken - Brown Shirt Left Wing Fascist) wrote in message news:<68d92f02.0401291752.16be9714@posting.google.com>...
> Charlie Wolf wrote in message news:<26fg10prs6h41oo153sitmhmcl7raq4j43@4ax.com>...
> > On 28 Jan 2004 18:48:35 -0000, Anonymous
> > wrote:
> >
> > >What medal did George W. Bush get for his Vietnam service?
> > You are really stupid. What medal did you get? Did you even serve?
> > How do we know that - you post using an anon remailer?
> >
> > Not everyone that served during Vietnam - and GWB DID serve honorably
> > and was honorably discharged - not everyone went to Vietnam. Not
> > everyone got medals.
> >
> > You are so fucking stupid.
> > Regards,
> >
> > snipped...
>
> Kerry's hero JFK started the Vietnam War and Kerry was all gung ho for
> it then. Vietnam was essentially a business deal between the Kennedys
> and LBJ. LBJ wanted a bigger cut and invited JFK to Dallas.
>
> Kerry came back to America and did not like the Vietnam War that Nixon
> had inherited from JFK & LBJ. Teddy Kennedy actually saw Kerry as
> someone he could grrom even though Teddy's brothers started the war.
> Yes RFK was involved. JFK & RFK were involved in the murder/coup of
> President Diem.
>
> Well Kerry joined the Hanoi Jane Fonda funded group, gather up some
> phony vets who never served and went in front of Congress to tell
> stories about how Vets committed atrocities. These were always third
> hand stories because they did not want to get the truth get in the way
> of Kerry's plans.
>
> Kerry's little charade helped smear all Vietnam Vets as baby killers
> because Kerry's merry pranksters of phony vets got in front of
> Congress & the nation telling their bogus stories and smeared ALL
> vets.
>
> Kerry's little antiwar charade paid big dividends and Teddy Kennedy
> got Kerry on the fast track.
>
> Later Kerry would sell out POW & MIAs when he spearheaded the thawing
> of relations with Vietnam. Kerry made no demands on Vietnam to
> account for POWs or MIAs. They were totally forgotten.
>
> So Vietnam was really a big scam that made LBJ very very wealthy, the
> Kennedys got richer and Kerry made a dubious career out of the war &
> hooked up with 2 wealthy wives - he has lived off.
>
> Meanwhile, poor Nixon who inherited the war left office and was
> practically bankrupt.

Here is More:

Teddy Kennedy & Kerry with fake Vietnam Vets smearking real vets as
"baby killers." Kerry's friend Jane Fonda was also calling American
POWs "liars & hypocrites."

Real GIs were too busy fighting the JFKs war or were already dead but
Kerry smeared them too.

"Hanoi Jane Kerry" wrote in message
news:4638d76a.0402111206.3db77e5a@posting.google.c om...

McCain praises Kerry as potential Gore running mate
July 26, 2000
Web posted at: 4:45 p.m. EDT (2045 GMT)

From CNN Capitol Hill Producer Dana Bash

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry, a potential
running mate for Vice President Al Gore, got a plug Wednesday from former
GOP presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain as they appeared together at a
Capitol Hill news conference.

"I think it would be very helpful to Vice President Gore. I think that Sen.
Kerry has proved his service to our nation, and his ability as an
accomplished debater and a person who knows the issues. Therefore I strongly
recommend that Vice President Gore not select Sen. Kerry as his running
mate," joked McCain, R-Arizona.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts

On a more serious note, McCain added later, "I think that the best Americans
from both parties should be the nominees of their parties, so that the
American people would have the very best to select from, and I would
certainly put Sen. Kerry in that category."



http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/.../mccain.kerry/

--
-My Real Name

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:41:15 GMT, "Roger" blind
in one eye, can't see out of the other wrote:

> wrote in message news:6gdk209eh4bp8d0qjmh1l86ta25a2ectp4@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 0122 GMT, "Roger" still
>> playing his stupid card, wrote:
>> >
>> >He started a war for no reason. People died as a result. Many people.
>> He started what the previous administration failed to act on.
>
>Using your "logic," he started what he failed to act on.
What did he fail to act on? He's doing what he has to do to
under the circumstances. Something that Clintoon and his merry band
of liberal NWO lemmings failed to do.
>
>He didn't start the war against Iraq until 2 1/2 years after HE had been in
>office.
So? It's the end result that counts.
No Saddam, no sons from hell, and the people finally have the freedom
they want.
Bin Laden on the run.
Terrorists being hunted down.
Now, try to dispute that with your "logic."
>
>What was his damn problem? Did Clinton really have control over what HE did?
>Why didn't BUSH act?
Part of the problem was: The UN, France and Germany, or did you
forget so soon?
Better bone up on current events, maybe that way you will not look so
stupid.
>
>> Funny how many dummycRATS agreed and all of a sudden they
>> are flip-flopping like fish outta water.
>> Must be that neo-soc liberal thing during an election year.
>> BTW, people die in wars, look it up in your history book Stupid.
>> >
>> >All are accepted facts. When taken together, were he not a President,
>he'd
>> >be a mass murderer.
>> LOL!!!! And that makes Bin Laden and Sadam what, Holy Saints?
>> Get back to us when you get a clue, Loser......
>