What Priorities?

[JeffL]

Regardless of how any of you feel about Rush Limbaugh, I ask that you read the following statement he made. I received this from a Coastie friend; I've added nothing to the e-mail text.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

This message is being forwarded across the country and all congressmen and senators should sit up and pay attention.

Limbaugh hits the nail on the head on "entitlements" and Congress taking care of itself.

Monologue by Rush Limbaugh, March 11, 2002

"I think the vast differences in compensation between the victims of the September 11th casualty, and those who die serving the country in uniform, are profound. No one is really talking about it either because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11th.

Well, I just can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family member in the September 11th attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.

If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you marry. And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.

Keep in mind that some of the people that are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough.

We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11th families are getting.

In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.

You see where this is going, don't you?

Folks, this is part and parcel of over fifty years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad.

"Patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime." - Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.

Every time when a pay raise comes up for the military they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low rent housing. However our own U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month and most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system.

If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7 you may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed you in harms way receive a pension of $15,000 per month.

I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting.

"When do we finally do something about this ??"


If this doesn't seem fair to you, it is time to forward this to as many people as you can.

[janecallanan]

Amen, Jeff. I'm going to send this out to people today.

[Wazza]

It's a universal problem. Power and politics, Patriotism and payment. Welfare and what's the use they get voted in and feather their nests.

[reconeil]

Though, and in all honesty I should be thanking Rush for such a great debunking of the self/clique-serving hypocrisy of it all and/or what defines America quite realistically and also politically.
Regardless Jeff, thanks for passing such along.

Still, since such truths are pretty-rare for The Public here in America and regarding great pensions for 1-Term U.S. Congressmen, I was a little disappointed that Mr. Truth (re. Rush) didn't elaborate on the matter. After all, there should be no doubt whatsoever that 1-Term U.S. Senators and 1-Term Presidents also get GREAT PENSIONS plus*** and/or those that the average Private Sector Citizen would kill for (most Public Sector Pensions are better also).

***"Plus" alludes to very likely: "Double, Triple or Quadruple Dipping". I don't know about other States. But, I believe that in New Jersey serving 1-Term Municipal gets you a pension, serving 1-Term County gets you another pension, serving 1-Term State gets you another pension,...and if you conived or worked your way all the way up the ladder to Federal Royalty, one qualifies yet for another pension. "Only in America", "Charity starts at home" "Birds of a feather flock together", and/or The Rich ALWAYS take care of The Rich FIRST.

Though, and in fairness to both bents,...at least when it comes to raising their grandeos salaries and grandeos pensions, they do quite differently set aside differences and bipartisanly work well together, which shows that IMPORTANT MATTERS can be easily resolved.
I guess that's what government working at its best is all about?

Neil